It is well settled legal principle that in addition to awarding compensation for pecuniary losses, compensation must also be granted with regard to the future prospects of the children. It is incumbent upon the Courts to consider the said aspect while awarding compensation. Reliance in this regard may be placed on the decisions rendered by this Court in General Manager, Kerala S. R. T. C. v. Susamma Thomas MANU/SC/0389/1994 : AIR1994SC1631 ; Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav MANU/SC/0338/1996 : (1993)IILLJ664SC ; and Lata Wadhwa case (supra). {Para 31}
32. In view of discussion made hereinbefore, it is quite clear the claim with regard to future prospect should have been be addressed by the courts below. While considering such claims, child's performance in school, the reputation of the school etc. might be taken into consideration. In the present case, records shows that the children were good in studies and studying in a reasonably good school. Naturally, their future prospect would be presumed to be good and bright. Since they were children, there is no yardstick to measure the loss of future prospects of these children. But as already noted, they were performing well in studies, natural consequence supposed to be a bright future. In the case of Lata Wadhwa (supra) and M. S. Grewal (supra), the Supreme Court recognised such future prospect as basis and factor to be considered. Therefore, denying compensation towards future prospects seems to be unjustified.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal No. 3608 of 2009.
Decided On: 15.05.2009
R.K. Malik and Ors. Vs. Kiran Pal and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
S.B. Sinha and Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.
Author: Mukundakam Sharma, J.