The application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was moved by the revisionist on the ground that P.W.-1 has to be cross examined on some important points. What were the questions, which had to be asked from P.W.-1 in further cross examination were not mentioned in the application nor important points, which required cross examination were mentioned. Earlier, the revisionist had already availed the opportunity of cross examination. Application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. was vague and was rightly rejected by learned Sessions Judge.
I do not find any good ground to interfere in the matter.
Allahabad High Court
Anurag Srivastava vs State Of U.P. & Another on 6 October, 2010
Author: S.C. Agarwal
Dated: 6.10.2010.
Citation: 2010 (71) ACC 504 (All).
Print Page
