In view of the office report, it would be clear that the respondents obviously managed to have the notice returned with postal remarks "not available in the house", "House locked" and "shop closed" respectively. In that view, it must be deemed that the notices have been served on the respondents.
Print Page
Supreme Court of India
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Hiralal & Ors on 15 January, 1996
Equivalent citations: JT 1996 (1), 669 1996 SCALE (1)SP35
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)

