Learned counsel for the appellant has
submitted that Pranay Sethi has only referred to
spousal consortium and no other consortium was
referred to in the judgment of Pranay Sethi, hence,
there is no justification for allowing the parental
consortium and filial consortium. The Constitution
Bench in Pranay Sethi has referred to amount of
Rs.40,000/- to the ‘loss of consortium’ but the
Constitution Bench had not addressed the issue as
to whether consortium of Rs.40,000/- is only
payable as spousal consortium. The judgment of
Pranay Sethi cannot be read to mean that it lays
down the proposition that the consortium is payable
only to the wife.
39. The Three-Judge Bench in United India
Insurance Company Ltd. (Supra) has categorically
laid down that apart from spousal consortium,
parental and filial consortium is payable. We feel
ourselves bound by the above judgment of Three
Judge Bench. We, thus, cannot accept the submission
of the learned counsel for the appellant that the
amount of consortium awarded to each of the
claimants is not sustainable.
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.3093 OF 2020
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs
SMT. SOMWATI
Author: ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.
Dated:SEPTEMBER 07, 2020.

