Showing posts with label pari materia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pari materia. Show all posts

Saturday, 9 May 2020

Supreme court: In certain circumstance definition of a word in one statute can not be imported in the other statute

The contention of the Respondent is that the term "University" needs to be read in accordance with the UGC Act, wherein only those Universities covered under the Section 2(f) of the UGC Act are covered under the PC Act. Such an interpretation, by importing the technical definition under a different Act may not be feasible herein. It is a settled law that technical definitions under one statute should not be imported to another statute which is not in pari materia with the first. The UGC Act and the PC Act are enactments which are completely distinct in their purpose, operation and object. The preamble of the UGC Act states that it is 'an Act to make provision for the co-ordination and determination of standards in Universities, and for that purpose, to establish a University Grants Commission'. On the other hand, the PC Act is an enactment meant to curb the social evil of corruption in the country. As such, the extension of technical definitions used under one Act to the other might not be appropriate, as the two Acts are not in pari materia with one another.

33. This brings us to the conclusion that purport of UGC Act cannot be borrowed under the PC Act, and that an independent meaning needs to be provided for the term "University" as occurring under the PC Act.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2018

Decided On: 27.04.2020

 State of Gujarat  Vs.  Mansukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah
Print Page

Supreme Court: Deemed University would come within Ambit of Prevention of Corruption Act


The point of contention relates to whether a deemed University would be included within the ambit of the PC Act, particularly Under Section 2(c)(xi) of the same, where the word used is "University". The learned senior Counsel for the Appellant-State submits that the word "University" as used in Section 2(c)(xi) of the Act, must be purposively interpreted. An institution which is "deemed to be a University" under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [UGC Act] plays the same role in society as a "University". These institutions have the common public duty of granting degrees, which are ultimately qualifications recognized in society. As such, an institution which is "deemed to be University", such as the institution in the present case, is included within the ambit of the term "University" used under the Act.


34. On a perusal of Section 2(c) of the PC Act, we may observe that the emphasis is not on the position held by an individual, rather, it is on the public duty performed by him/her. In this regard, the legislative intention was to not provide an exhaustive list of authorities which are covered, rather a general definition of 'public servant' is provided thereunder. This provides an important internal evidence as to the definition of the term "University".


42. Under the UGC Act, University is defined and recognized Under Section 2(f) in the following manner:

University" means a University established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, a Provincial Act or a State Act, and includes any such institution as may, in consultation with the University concerned, be recognized by the Commission in accordance with the Regulations made in this behalf under this Act.

43. A 'deemed to be University' is recognized Under Section 3 of the UGC Act, in the following manner:

Application of Act to institutions for higher studies other than Universities

3. The Central Government may, on the advice of the Commission, declare by notification in the Official Gazette, that any institution for higher education, other than a University, shall be deemed to be a University for the purposes of this Act, and on such a declaration being made, all the provisions of this Act shall apply to such institution as if it were a University within the meaning of Clause (f) of Section 2.

44. As discussed earlier, the object of the PC Act was not only to prevent the social evil of bribery and corruption, but also to make the same applicable to individuals who might conventionally not be considered public servants. The purpose under the PC Act was to shift focus from those who are traditionally called public officials, to those individuals who perform public duties. Keeping the same in mind, as rightly submitted by the learned senior Counsel for the Appellant-State, it cannot be stated that a "Deemed University" and the officials therein, perform any less or any different a public duty, than those performed by a University simpliciter, and the officials therein.

45. Therefore, for all the above reasons, we are of the opinion that the High Court was incorrect in holding that a "Deemed University" is excluded from the ambit of the term "University" Under Section 2(c)(xi) of the PC Act.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2018

Decided On: 27.04.2020

 State of Gujarat  Vs.  Mansukhbhai Kanjibhai Shah

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.

Citation: MANU/SC/0417/2020

Authored By : N.V. Ramana, Ajay Rastogi

N.V. Ramana, J.
Print Page