However, we are of the view that the High Court clearly fell into error in affirming the conviction of the accused-respondent for the offence punishable under Section 201 of the IPC.
35. It is not in dispute that the accused-respondent has not preferred any appeal challenging his conviction for the said offence. However, the absence of an appeal by the accused-respondent does not, by itself, denude this Court of its appellate jurisdiction. In exercise of powers under Section 386 of the CrPC
[corresponding to Section 427 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023], the appellate Court is vested with the power to examine the correctness of the findings and sentence recorded by the Court below and to reverse, alter or affirm the
same, as the interests of justice may require.
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF 2026
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s). 8846 of 2025)
THE STATE OF ASSAM Vs MOINUL HAQUE @ MONU
Mehta, J.
Dated: APRIL 16, 2026.
Read full judgment here: Click here.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment