Showing posts with label adhar card. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adhar card. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 October 2024

Supreme Court: Motor accident claim tribunal can not determine age of deceased based on age mentioned in Adhar Card

 In this regard, attention is drawn towards Office Memorandum dated 2-0.12.2018 issued by MeitY through UIDAI, where it has been stated that “An Aadhaar number can be used for establishing identity of an individual subject to authentication and thereby, per se its not a proof of date of birth” (copy enclosed). {Para 4}

5. This aspect of the Aadhar Act, 2016 has been reiterated/highlighted/stressed upon by different High Courts in recent judgments. The most recent one is given by the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, in the case of State of Maharashtra V/S Unique Identification Authority of India And Ors. dated 28.07.2023 (copy enclosed).

6. In view of the above, it is required that use of Aadhaar, as a proof of DoB needs to be deleted from the list of acceptable documents.

7. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

Encl : As above.

(Sanjeev Yadav)

Director

Tel: 011-23478609

Email: dirl.auth-hq@uidai.net.in

(Emphasis supplied)

9.7 Judicial notice has also been taken of the circular above. Recently, a learned Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court in Gopalbhai Naranbhai Vaghela v. Union Of India & Anr.15 in view thereof directed the release of the petitioner's pension in accordance with the date as mentioned in the School Leaving Certificate, keeping aside the difference in the date of birth as mentioned in the Aadhar Card, which was not relevant for the purpose of such consideration.

9.8 In Shabana v. NCT of Delhi, a learned Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in a case where the petitioner-mother sought a writ of habeas corpus for her daughter, recorded a statement made for and on behalf of UIDAI that “Aadhar Card may not be used as proof of date of birth.”

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF 2024

(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.23939-23940 of 2023)

SAROJ & ORS. Vs IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. & ORS.

Coram: SANJAY KAROL J.,

Citation: 2024 INSC 816.

Dated:24th October, 2024.

Print Page

Sunday, 16 February 2020

Whether date of birth mentioned in ADHAR CARD is conclusive?

The learned A.G.A. has submitted that the date of birth entered in an Aadhar Card has not been conferred any conclusive status by law and, therefore, it would be appropriate that this petition be disposed off by requiring the investigating agency to determine the age of the victim and record the statement of the victim and, thereafter, take appropriate action as per law.

6. Having perused the record. We do not find any other documentary evidence on the basis of which we could hold the victim to be an adult.  It is not provided by law that the date of birth entered in an Adhaar Card would be conclusive.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD

Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 24015 of 2019

Decided On: 22.11.2019

 Kishan Kumar  Vs. State of U.P. 

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Manoj Misra and Virendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ.

Print Page

Saturday, 11 February 2017

Whether Adhar card can be treated as proof of citizenship?

 Section 9 of the said Act reads as follows:
“9. The Aadhaar number or the authentication thereof shall not, by itself, confer any right of, or be proof of, citizenship or domicile in respect of an Aadhaar number holder.”
7. In view of the aforesaid provision, it is clear that the said Aadhaar Card by itself shall not confer any right of or be proof of, citizenship or domicile in respect of the holder thereto. Apart from the said Card, the letter issued by the representative of the local body as to the residence of the petitioner also does not, ipso facto, confer citizenship on the petitioner.
8. Under such circumstances, I am unable to rely on the aforesaid documents as prima facie proof of citizenship in favour of the petitioner.
In the High Court of Calcutta
(Before Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
In the matter of: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 02.09.2016 in connection with Basirhat Police Station Case No. 974 of 2016 dated 23.08.2016 under Section 14F of the Indian Foreigners Act.
In Re: Rani Mistri 
Citation: 2016 SCC OnLine Cal 8283
CRM 7148 of 2016
Decided on November 30, 2016
Print Page