In the context of facts of the present case it
is sufficient to observe that non statutory provisions can hardly be
treated as mandatory unless their non observance is shown to have
caused legal injury by affecting some valuable rights of the writ
petitioners. As discussed earlier no such case could be made out by
the appellants so as to require interference on account of alleged
shortcomings in preparation or verification of Annexure II.
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.9363 OF 2011
is sufficient to observe that non statutory provisions can hardly be
treated as mandatory unless their non observance is shown to have
caused legal injury by affecting some valuable rights of the writ
petitioners. As discussed earlier no such case could be made out by
the appellants so as to require interference on account of alleged
shortcomings in preparation or verification of Annexure II.
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.9363 OF 2011
Balasaheb Arjun Torbole Vs The Administrator & Divisional Commissioner
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J.
Citation; (2015)6SCC534,
