Showing posts with label open land. Show all posts
Showing posts with label open land. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 February 2019

Whether municipal corporation can issue notice to take possession of enclosed land ?

 This Section, thus, makes it very clear that, the notice under Section 299 of the MMC Act can be issued, not only in respect of the open land, but also when such land is enclosed and which lies within the 'Regular Line of Public Street' and it is not occupied by a building or if a platform, verandah, step or some other structure external to the building abutting on a public street or a portion of a platform, verandah, step or other such structure is within the regular line of such street, then also, the Commissioner, after giving to the owner of the land or building, not less than 7 days clear written notice, of his intention so to do, take possession on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of the said land with its enclosing wall, hedge or fence, if any, or of the said platform, verandah, step or other such structure. The reading of this Section, therefore, makes it clear that, except for the main structure, other structures, which are not part of the main building, which even if standing on the land, for taking possession of such land, the notice under Section 299 of the MMC Act is valid.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY

Appeal From Order No. 595 of 2018 and Civil Application No. 787 of 2018

Decided On: 28.09.2018

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai  Vs.  Bhandup Amber Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, J.

Citation: 2019(1) MHLJ 836
Print Page

Thursday, 27 November 2014

Whether small cause court has jurisdiction to try tenancy dispute relating to open land?

Undisputedly, the dispute pertains to open land and the appellate Court should have seen that under the provisions of Provincial Small Causes Courts' Act, the Small Cause  Court had jurisdiction even otherwise to entertain, try and decide such a suit. The decree passed by the trial Court could not have been set aside on that count and the appeal should have been decided on merits.
Bombay High Court
Abdul Shahid Patel vs Smt. Rameshwari Devi Gyarsilal ... on 3 February, 2014
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
Citation; 2014 (5) ALLMR 684
Print Page