Supreme Court explains 4-Steps To Test If Criminal Case Can Be Quashed Based On Defence Material Before Trial

 In Rajiv Thapar and Others v. Madan Lal

Kapoor8, this Court laid down a 4-step test to

determine if criminal proceedings can be

quashed on the basis of defense

material/official records prior to trial:

“30. Based on the factors canvassed in the

foregoing paragraphs, we would delineate the

following steps to determine the veracity of a

prayer for quashment raised by an accused by

invoking the power vested in the High Court

under Section 482 CrPC:

30.1. Step one: whether the material relied

upon by the accused is sound, reasonable, and

indubitable i.e. the material is of sterling and

impeccable quality?

30.2. Step two: whether the material relied

upon by the accused would rule out the

assertions contained in the charges levelled

against the accused i.e. the material is

sufficient to reject and overrule the factual

assertions contained in the complaint i.e. the

material is such as would persuade a

reasonable person to dismiss and condemn the

factual basis of the accusations as false?

30.3. Step three: whether the material relied

upon by the accused has not been refuted by

the prosecution/complainant; and/or the

material is such that it cannot be justifiably

refuted by the prosecution/complainant?

30.4. Step four: whether proceeding with the

trial would result in an abuse of process of the

court, and would not serve the ends of justice?

30.5. If the answer to all the steps is in the

affirmative, the judicial conscience of the High

Court should persuade it to quash such

criminal proceedings in exercise of power

vested in it under Section 482 CrPC. Such

exercise of power, besides doing justice to the

accused, would save precious court time,

which would otherwise be wasted in holding

such a trial (as well as proceedings arising

therefrom) specially when it is clear that the

same would not conclude in the conviction of

the accused.”{Para 19}

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2026

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.2939 OF 2026)

RAHUL  Vs  STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Author: AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.

Citation: 2026 INSC 825.

Read full judgment here: Click here.

Print Page