What are the basic concept of indemnity and guarantee with reference to Indian Contract Act?

 Indemnity

Definition: Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines a contract of indemnity as a contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person.

Key Points:

1. Parties Involved: There are two parties in a contract of indemnity:

   • The indemnifier: The person who promises to indemnify or make good the loss.
   • The indemnified or indemnity holder: The person who is protected against the loss.

2. Nature of Contract: It is a contingent contract, meaning it is enforceable only when the specified loss occurs.

3. Essence: The core idea is to provide financial security to the indemnity holder against potential losses.

Print Page

Important Notes on contract law

 

1) Twelve Golden Rules governing ratification of act of agent by principal.

https://www.lawweb.in/2020/07/ratification-by-principal-of-act-of.html

2) Difference between Liquidated and unliquidated damages

https://www.lawweb.in/2020/07/difference-between-liquidated-and.html

3) What is basic concept of doctrine of frustration with reference to Indian contract act? 

https://www.lawweb.in/2024/06/what-is-basic-concept-of-doctrine-of.html

4) What are the basic concept of indemnity and guarantee with reference to Indian Contract Act?

https://www.lawweb.in/2024/06/what-are-basic-concept-of-indemnity-and.html

Print Page

What is basic concept of doctrine of frustration with reference to Indian contract act?

 

The Doctrine of Frustration is a legal concept in contract law that allows for the discharge of contractual obligations when unforeseen events render performance impossible. It is codified in Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which states that agreements to do impossible acts are void, and when a contract becomes impossible or unlawful due to uncontrollable events, the contract is void. The Doctrine of Frustration is an exception to the general rule that obliges parties to honor their contractual promises, providing a means to harmonize the integrity of contracts with equitable considerations. The doctrine applies when the performance of a contract has been frustrated, and the performance of it has become impossible to perform due to any unavoidable reason or condition. The doctrine makes any contract or agreement which is incapable of being performed or becomes so after it is made, void and hence, discharges the parties from their liabilities mentioned in the contract. The Doctrine of Frustration has evolved over time and has been incorporated into Indian law through Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Important judgments on doctrine of frustration of contract :

Click here

Print Page

Difference between Liquidated and unliquidated damages

1) Contracts generally include a provision for the one party to pay liquidated damages (or liquidated and ascertained damages, ) to the other party in the event that the contract is breached. Liquidated damages are a pre-agreed amount of money that is set out in advance in the contract, that fixes the sum payable as damages if the one party breaches the contract - typically by failing to perform contract.

Unliquidated damages are damages that are payable for a breach, the exact amount of which has not been pre-agreed. The sum to be paid as compensation is said to be ‘at large’ and is determined after the breach occurs by a court.

Print Page

Twelve Golden Rules governing ratification of act of agent by principal.

There are twelve rules governing ratification of act of agent by principal.

1) The contract must be made by the agent for or on account of the principal,and not on his own account.

2) The principal must be in existence at the time of the act.Thus, a newly formed Company can not ratify an act done in its name before its incorporation.

3) A transaction which is void ab initio can not be ratified.A principal can ratify only those acts which he is legally competent to do.Thus,there can not be ratification of a void contract.A minor,can not after attaining majority,ratify a contract made during his minority,because a minor's contract is absolutely void.

Print Page