It is ignoring that, the learned Magistrate refused
to have the petition disposed on merits with a reason that
this Court has prescribed time limit for disposal of the case.
It is not at all a good reasoning and it can no way be
allowed. The reasoning that altering of charge would
prolong the trial is also erroneous and not sustainable. A
request made by the prosecutor to alter the charge with an
allegation that the charge is not in accordance with the
report of the investigating officer could be dismissed, only if
the allegation is not true. A trial without a proper charge
would only lead to miscarriage of justice. In such
circumstances, this Court shall not hesitate to interfere in
exercise of the inherent powers vested on this Court under
Sec.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, though no
revision is maintainable.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3162 of 2009()
AKBAR.A., PUTHEN VEEDU, NORTH MSM
Vs
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN
Dated :24/11/2009
Citation: 2010CriLJ2555, ILR2010(2)KeralaKER, ILR2010(2)Kerala875, 2010 (1) KHC 738, 2010(1)KLT714
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3162 of 2009()
AKBAR.A., PUTHEN VEEDU, NORTH MSM
Vs
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN
Dated :24/11/2009
Citation: 2010CriLJ2555, ILR2010(2)KeralaKER, ILR2010(2)Kerala875, 2010 (1) KHC 738, 2010(1)KLT714